🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.