🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in Russian state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide later this week regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union officials have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as seizing EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a clear signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."